Monday, October 1, 2018

Kavenough hearings - Flake’s compromise

The look on Jeff Flake’s face on face the nation when answering the question “could you have done that if you were running for re-election?’ Tells it all. He looked over at Senator Coons and they had a very chummy glance.  Flake is being used and the virtuous sounding approach of “reaching across the isle” is going to result in pulling this process into an increasingly and exhausting cloud of innuendos.

The delay for one week is already being pushed back by one of Ford’s attorneys.  If anyone testifies differently to what has already been said, they will purger themself.  The intent of the investigation is to create a cloud over Kavenough that his drinking habits were so extreme that he couldn’t remember the events in question.  There is a reason why there hasn’t been an investigation until now.   All they have is “100% certainty” that it was Kavenough as Ford testified without any other potential witnesses agreeing with the account.  A very crucial point to know is whether any hypnosis was used in “therapy” sessions.   Using hypnosis to identify a potential perp has been ruled as not admissible in court. We are caught in a vortex where the legal requirements of a criminal proceeding are being quickly dismissed as not applicable and instead, people are taking sides based on political bias and being swayed by the seriousness of the allegations.

Flake has a weak will to actually stand up for a principle and was used by a ferocious machine who has deemed the value of at least two families as being collateral damage.

Those two ranting souls that were conveniently recorded asking Flake the question “who will defend us” near Flake’s elevator were said to be what pulled Flake into that moment of “bipartisanship.”  Think about what practical help those women were asking for.  Is that something that a Supreme Court justice would either be able to provide or deny them?  

Liberalism is a ruse of declaring a superior level of “caring” and being able to solve complex solutions while continuing with relentless clawing and running over every obstacle to stay in power. Once in power, the reality of liberalism, not being able to actually deliver on its promises, is smoothed over with an endless series of talking points and excuses.  When someone comes along and declares that liberalism has no clothes on (like that famous king not having any clothes), they are shouted down as being ______(too harsh, uncaring, etc.)